Tag: defense-spending

  • Record share of Americans support higher defense spending

    Record share of Americans support higher defense spending

    [ad_1]

    A record share of Americans support higher defense spending, according to the annual Reagan National Defense Survey released Thursday.

    Just under 80% of respondents said they would prefer a larger military budget, with 49% saying they are strongly in favor of one. The 79% share is two points higher than last year’s survey, as a super majority often expresses support on the question. It also outpaces some of America’s other foreign policy priorities, such as aid (43%) and “promoting freedom abroad” (61%).

    Still, spending more on domestic goals such as Social Security (89%), health care (84%) and infrastructure (89%) were all more popular — a growing tradeoff as America’s entitlement programs threaten to squeeze the defense budget by the end of the decade.

    The Ronald Reagan Institute has surveyed U.S. public opinion on national security for the last six years, and the latest poll was conducted two days after the November presidential election. Rather than focus on voters specifically, the survey included a representative sample of around 2,500 Americans.

    National security is often one of the least prioritized issues among voters during an election, but the last year has been an exception. Both major candidates presented vastly different ideas of America’s proper place in the world, and many voters were dissatisfied with the Biden administration’s policy around Israel, which for the last year has fought separate wars in Gaza and, more recently, Lebanon.

    Overall, public trust in the military ticked up after a multiyear fall, though it’s still nearly 20 points below the 70% high recorded in 2018.

    A majority of respondents supported continuing U.S. security aid to Ukraine (55%) and Israel (54%), and a plurality (41%) said the U.S. military should be “large enough to win separate wars against China and Russia at the same time,” a larger force than envisioned today.

    “We certainly saw that reflected in President [Donald] Trump’s rhetoric in this campaign, channeling ‘peace through strength’ as a core driving ideology. What we see in the survey is that message is is resonating with the American people,” said Rachel Hoff, the Reagan Institute’s policy director.

    That said, Trump hasn’t defined what “peace” or “strength” means to him. Defense spending rose during his first term in office, but the president-elect’s opinions on defense spending don’t fit neatly into any wing of the Republican party’s foreign policy community — leaving different groups to jostle for influence.

    Those factions are mainly split into three camps. Traditional defense hawks advocate for greater military spending and an increased American military presence around the world. Prioritizers and restrainers, on the other hand, would prefer to pick and choose what crises to put first or do less altogether.

    Of the three, those calling for America to shift resources away from Europe and toward Asia have the least public support. Indeed, 88% of the Republicans responding to the survey said that defense spending should rise.

    “The prioritizers are not reflective of what Republican voters prefer for their foreign policy,” said Thomas Kenna, also of the Reagan Institute. “Republicans want us to have a military big enough to handle both China and Russia at the same time.”

    The full survey results are available at the Ronald Reagan Institute’s website.

    Noah Robertson is the Pentagon reporter at Defense News. He previously covered national security for the Christian Science Monitor. He holds a bachelor’s degree in English and government from the College of William & Mary in his hometown of Williamsburg, Virginia.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pentagon chief Austin embarks on his last Asia visit amid uncertainty

    Pentagon chief Austin embarks on his last Asia visit amid uncertainty

    [ad_1]

    Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin will travel to the Indo-Pacific Friday, his 12th and final trip to the region America has long said is its top priority and home to its main rival: China.

    While there, he will visit a bevy of U.S. allies and meet with colleagues on what amounts to a farewell tour. In his time as secretary, Austin has led a renaissance for American forces around the region. The Pentagon is now partnering with more countries and working closer with its longtime allies.

    That list includes many of the countries Austin will visit in the coming week: in particular the Philippines and Australia, where he will join a counterpart from Japan. He will also attend a meeting of regional defense ministers in Laos and on the way back become the first U.S. secretary of defense to visit Fiji, where American officials are negotiating a deal to allow military access.

    Through this larger and more tight-knit group of partners, the U.S. hopes to build and maintain weapons closer to China’s shores, while also spreading out its forces in the region, thus making them harder to target.

    “Secretary Austin has done things that you look at and say, five years ago, that would have been unimaginable,” a senior defense official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told reporters before the trip.

    Despite the celebration, Austin’s arrival will also come at a moment of uncertainty in what he has helped build. Donald Trump’s reelection as U.S. president last week, along with the outcome of Japan’s general election the month before, marks the first round of major political change that could disrupt countries in the region unified by their concerns over China, which in recent years has grown stronger and more aggressive toward its neighbors.

    Pentagon officials have long maintained that their view of China, and the need to compete with it, has bipartisan commitment. But Trump’s nomination of Pete Hegseth, a veteran and Fox News host without Washington experience, is a reminder that the incoming president can stray from the political mainstream.

    “I don’t think anybody’s going to object to these posture changes. Now there may be discussions about the level of burden sharing that’s ongoing in those relationships,” said Zack Cooper, who studies American alliances in Asia at the American Enterprise Institute.

    In particular, Trump has questioned America’s commitment to Taiwan, a self-governing island that China considers part of its rightful territory. U.S. policy is deliberately ambiguous on whether it would defend Taiwan during an invasion, leaving the choice to the president.

    Taipei is on track to spend around 2.6% of its GDP on defense and has billions of dollars worth of American arms on order, but Trump and some of his advisers have said its budget needs to rise.

    Noah Robertson is the Pentagon reporter at Defense News. He previously covered national security for the Christian Science Monitor. He holds a bachelor’s degree in English and government from the College of William & Mary in his hometown of Williamsburg, Virginia.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Italian minister proposes fresh taxes on arms makers’ windfall profits

    Italian minister proposes fresh taxes on arms makers’ windfall profits

    [ad_1]

    ROME — Italian defense companies whose profits have soared thanks to armed conflicts around the world could face increased taxation, Italy’s finance minister has suggested in a speech which has been challenged by his allies.

    Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti said the imposition of fresh taxes on Italian arms makers could be part of across-the-board revenue raising by the Italian government as it struggles to boost its finances.

    “There will be a general call for everyone to contribute, not just banks,” he said on Thursday, adding, “One could say that with all these wars, those who produce arms are doing particularly well.”

    Asked if he would consider upping taxation on the sector, he said, “Evidently yes.”

    He added, “We will be approving a budget that will require sacrifices from everyone.”

    Shares in Italy’s largest defense firm, Leonardo, dropped after Giorgetti’s speech to 20.56 euros from 21.10 a day earlier before rising slightly to 20.87 euros on Friday.

    The firm’s share price has risen dramatically in the last two years on the strength of new orders and the rise in defense spending fueled by the conflict in Ukraine.

    From between six and seven euros a share just before the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the price of Leonardo shares reached around 24 euros in June of this year.

    Announcing its half year results in July, the firm said it had a record order backlog worth €43 billion, helping it make a half year profit of €555 million, up 168% on the previous year.

    Giorgetti’s announcement, which came as the Italian government works on its year-end budget, prompted surprise from allies in Italy’s right wing government who oppose new taxes.

    Federico Freni, a junior finance minister who answers to Giorgetti, said, “There is no tax raise for anyone being studied. New taxes are not part of the DNA of this government.”

    On Friday, Italian foreign minister Antonio Tajani, said, “No new taxes, we are totally against imposing new taxes,” adding, “There have been some misinterpretations of some words said yesterday” by Minister Giorgetti.

    He said, “as long as we are in government there will be no new taxes for Italians.”

    Tom Kington is the Italy correspondent for Defense News.

    [ad_2]

    Source link